Search found 146 matches
- Mon Mar 21, 2011 9:02 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Monday March 21st 2011
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2936
Re: Spoilers For Monday March 21st 2011
I thought WANTERS had previously been disallowed. Is it a new addition in ODE3?
- Thu Mar 17, 2011 7:19 am
- Forum: Countdown - Current recaps
- Topic: Friday 11 March 2011 (Series 64, Prelim 45)
- Replies: 16
- Views: 3088
Re: Friday 11 March 2011 (Series 64, Prelim 45)
I thought that in these situations they mocked up a subsitute round at the end of the end to allow both contestants to declare an acceptable 6-letter word.
- Thu Feb 24, 2011 5:02 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Thursday February 24th 2011
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4034
Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 24th 2011
R2 RENTBOY
R3 SEGUEING
R3 SEGUEING
- Tue Feb 22, 2011 4:58 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Mike Spellars for Tuesday 22nd February 2011
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3039
Re: Mike Spellars for Tuesday 22nd February 2011
R10
7x5=35
35-3=32
32x6=192
192-7=185
185x5=925
7x5=35
35-3=32
32x6=192
192-7=185
185x5=925
- Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:25 am
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Monday February 21st 2011
- Replies: 18
- Views: 3630
Re: Spoilers For Monday February 21st 2011
Especially considering that Dan is supposedly on the show later this week, so should remember that Mark Foster was in DC while he was there Erm, isn't this a spoiler, James, unless my counting up to eight is faulty? Andrew Castle was on a couple of weeks ago, so I don't see how this could be seen a...
- Tue Feb 22, 2011 8:14 am
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Monday February 21st 2011
- Replies: 18
- Views: 3630
Re: Spoilers For Monday February 21st 2011
Don't know, particularly since this week's guest is Mark Foster.Dan McColm wrote:And why can't Andrew Castle sit still in the chair?
- Thu Feb 17, 2011 5:17 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Thursday February 17th 2011
- Replies: 20
- Views: 4062
Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 17th 2011
I know that 'rules are rules', but I was surprised that GOATIEST had to be specified. One-syllable adjectives and two-syllable adjectives ending in Y form the comparative and superlative using -ier and -iest ( http://www.grammar.cl/Intermediate/Comparatives_Superlatives.htm ). Other adjectives use '...
- Sat Feb 12, 2011 2:05 pm
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: Our Rachel's Getting Hitched!!
- Replies: 20
- Views: 2388
Re: Our Rachel's Getting Hitched!!
Monday is Valentine's day and the start of week 6 of the series, and thus presumably of the second session of filming. Soooooo?
- Fri Feb 04, 2011 3:56 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Friday February 4th 2011
- Replies: 27
- Views: 4384
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 4th 2011
And what precisely is a MEGALITRE? Surely a litre is a litre is a litre?
- Tue Jan 25, 2011 4:57 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Tuesday January 25th 2011
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2614
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday January 25th 2011
Someone will be sad enough to know this. When was the last time that 9s came up in successive rounds on successive days? Also, unless I missed something, Susie didn't really give the origin of the word 'jeans' itself. I believe it derives from 'gênes', from the French for Genoa.
- Thu Dec 09, 2010 4:30 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Thursday December 9th 2010
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2952
Re: Spoilers For Thursday December 9th 2010
Way out of time, but closer still for R14
(9+1)x7 = 70
70-2 = 68
68x6x2 = 816
Haven't checked, but suspect this is closest possible.
(9+1)x7 = 70
70-2 = 68
68x6x2 = 816
Haven't checked, but suspect this is closest possible.
- Fri Nov 19, 2010 4:15 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Friday November 19th 2010
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2121
Re: Spoilers For Friday November 19th 2010
R14
(((7+3)x6)-1)x7x2=826
This is the best you can do.
(((7+3)x6)-1)x7x2=826
This is the best you can do.
- Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:55 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Wednesday November 17th 2010
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1217
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday November 17th 2010
R7
WATERLOG
WATERLOG
- Mon Nov 15, 2010 5:12 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Monday November 15th 2010
- Replies: 18
- Views: 2465
Re: Spoilers For Monday November 15th 2010
When did we last have a female contestant under the age of 18? I remember someone winning 2 or 3 games around about 2003, but I may have missed someone.
- Fri Oct 22, 2010 6:51 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Friday October 22nd 2010
- Replies: 75
- Views: 11673
Re: Spoilers For Friday October 22nd 2010
It could have been either, and, since by that time he didn't have even a mathematical chance of winning, I suppose Susie couldn't see any point in challenging him.Michael Wallace wrote:Lastly didn't the challenger say VESTAGE^ which isn't in? Would he have guessed VESTIGE?
- Fri Oct 08, 2010 3:50 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Friday October 8th 2010
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1421
Re: Spoilers For Friday October 8th 2010
R7 WARBLIER
I suspect Susie was too kind to mention it, since they had an alternative 8.
I suspect Susie was too kind to mention it, since they had an alternative 8.
- Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:40 am
- Forum: Countdown - Current recaps
- Topic: Thursday 2nd September 2010 (Series 63, Prelim 39)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1163
Re: Thursday 2nd September 2010 (Series 63, Prelim 39)
There was only one round (R14) in which both contestants scored. Is this a record?
- Tue Aug 10, 2010 3:28 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Tuesday August 10th 2010
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2428
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday August 10th 2010
Is TWOCED (taking without consent) valid in (I think) R10?
- Fri Aug 06, 2010 4:09 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Current recaps
- Topic: Tuesday 27th April 2010 (Series 62, Prelim 72)
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1219
Re: Tuesday 27th April 2010 (Series 62, Prelim 72)
Having watched the repeat, the recap for R14 is wrong. The target was 608 and the contestants both got 610 for 2 away.
- Wed May 26, 2010 4:16 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Wednesday May 26th 2010
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2188
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday May 26th 2010
R14
((50 + 100/25) x 8) - 75
Switched off after conundrum, so trust Rachel didn't get this one at the end.
((50 + 100/25) x 8) - 75
Switched off after conundrum, so trust Rachel didn't get this one at the end.
- Sun May 23, 2010 7:06 am
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Friday May 21st 2010
- Replies: 14
- Views: 2328
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 21st 2010
I had already switched off, so didn't see that. Is it my imagination, or does Rachel either get, or get the chance to show, solutions to numbers games out of time far more often than Carol did? Initially I thought it was because the production team wanted to give her every chance to show she had sol...
- Sat May 22, 2010 5:17 am
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Friday May 21st 2010
- Replies: 14
- Views: 2328
Re: Spoilers For Friday May 21st 2010
R14
((25 * (7 - 4)) + 4) * 7 + 9 = 562
((25 * (7 - 4)) + 4) * 7 + 9 = 562
- Tue May 11, 2010 6:24 am
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Monday May 10th 2010
- Replies: 14
- Views: 2044
Re: Spoilers For Monday May 10th 2010
Is this because the comeback was by a more mature lady against a younger man?James Robinson wrote:That was probably one of the most surprising comebacks of all time
- Fri Apr 30, 2010 2:55 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Friday 30th April 2010
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1998
Re: Spoilers For Friday 30th April 2010
Didn't write down the letters, but have a horrible feeling now that there was only one E in R1.
- Fri Apr 30, 2010 2:37 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Friday 30th April 2010
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1998
Re: Spoilers For Friday 30th April 2010
R1 RELIQUES
- Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:40 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Tuesday March 9th 2010
- Replies: 33
- Views: 5095
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday March 9th 2010
Not a fan of the "I've finished the numbers game so I'm going to sit back and give my opponent a hint that I've done it and that it's pretty easy". It's not so much that it looks smug (unless it's really, really easy), but it can help the opponent knowing that it's possible. It applies ev...
- Fri Mar 05, 2010 3:39 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Friday March 5th 2010
- Replies: 27
- Views: 3761
Re: Spoilers For Friday March 5th 2010
R3
OBTUSELY
OBTUSELY
- Wed Feb 17, 2010 9:56 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Wednesday 17th Feb
- Replies: 93
- Views: 22990
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 17th Feb
If a contestant offered CHOLIAMBS they'd be wrong, unless of course they happened to be playing you, in which case they'd be awarded double points, or however many it took to make sure your preposterously quibbly personality never appeared on our screens again. Nothing personal of course, but you r...
- Tue Feb 16, 2010 4:54 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Tuesday February 16th 2010
- Replies: 29
- Views: 2939
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday February 16th 2010
Usually filmed on consecutive days, but if you happen to be at the end of a filming session, the break could be several weeks.Jojo Apollo wrote:How long a break is there between each of those 5 filmed episodes?
- Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:48 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Thursday February 11th 2010
- Replies: 43
- Views: 4058
Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 11th 2010
How dare you insult me like that! It was within the time.Gavin Chipper wrote:Kirk Bevins wrote:
Malcolm James wrote:
R14
(50 + ((7 - 1) x 4)) x (10 + 3) = 962
Again, I'll assume this was out of time?
- Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:14 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Thursday February 11th 2010
- Replies: 43
- Views: 4058
Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 11th 2010
R14
(50 + ((7 - 1) x 4)) x (10 + 3) = 962
(50 + ((7 - 1) x 4)) x (10 + 3) = 962
- Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:44 am
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Friday January 22nd 2010
- Replies: 43
- Views: 3619
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 22nd 2010
Actually I think the winner was the reserve contestant, because he was local to the studio. the loser came from London.
- Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:24 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Tuesday December 8th 2009
- Replies: 35
- Views: 4189
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday December 8th 2009
R9 DC Beater
DONORCIDE - I'm surprised Phil Hammond didn't spot it. It would solve the organ transplnt problem.
DONORCIDE - I'm surprised Phil Hammond didn't spot it. It would solve the organ transplnt problem.
- Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:31 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoiler for Friday November 27th 2009
- Replies: 57
- Views: 4754
Re: Spoiler for Friday November 27th 2009
Nice alternative for R5
(100/5 - 1) x ((6 x 2) + 7) = 361
(100/5 - 1) x ((6 x 2) + 7) = 361
- Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:07 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoiler for Friday November 27th 2009
- Replies: 57
- Views: 4754
Re: Spoiler for Friday November 27th 2009
R1 DC-equaller WOOLLENS
R12 DC-beater HEIRESS
R12 DC-beater HEIRESS
- Fri Nov 27, 2009 1:00 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Current recaps
- Topic: Thursday 26th November 2009 (Series 61, Prelim 94)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 797
Re: Thursday 26th November 2009 (Series 61, Prelim 94)
There seems to be a pattern here. I can think of four or five young(ish) female contestant in the last couple of years who, like batsmen putting together a fluent 40 before getting out, look strong in winning two or three games before losing. Not to say that there aren't men like that, but this is p...
- Tue Nov 10, 2009 12:09 pm
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: Ram
- Replies: 19
- Views: 2941
Re: Ram
And I expect Dinos to be very offended every time there's a Pippa on.Sue Sanders wrote: If there's ever a 'Dorothy' on, block your ears when they call her 'Dotty'!
- Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:08 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Friday November 6th 2009
- Replies: 50
- Views: 5543
Re: Spoilers For Friday November 6th 2009
R14
6x3x2 = 30
30+4=34
8+5=13
34X13= 442
6x3x2 = 30
30+4=34
8+5=13
34X13= 442
- Wed Nov 04, 2009 1:41 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Current recaps
- Topic: Tuesday 3rd November 2007 (Series 61, Prelim 77)
- Replies: 15
- Views: 2866
Re: Tuesday 3rd November 2007 (Series 61, Prelim 77)
It's Penarth.
- Fri Oct 23, 2009 2:40 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Friday October 23rd 2009
- Replies: 21
- Views: 3115
Re: Spoilers for Friday October 23rd 2009
Also in R2 or 3 DC's offering of ORATOR is only 6, not 7, unless I misheard.
- Fri Oct 23, 2009 2:37 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Friday October 23rd 2009
- Replies: 21
- Views: 3115
Re: Spoilers for Friday October 23rd 2009
R4
SOONEST
SOONEST
- Tue Oct 20, 2009 8:57 am
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: What is the point...
- Replies: 83
- Views: 7984
Re: What is the point...
Anyone remember Martin Gardner, who used to post frequently? IIRC he only appeared on the show as a reserve because he lived in Leeds at the times, and he ended up an octochamp. Against that, there must be any number of people who scored well in auditions, but who didn't perform well in the studio. ...
- Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:18 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Monday 5th October
- Replies: 52
- Views: 6020
Re: Spoilers for Monday 5th October
R13: FRIEZES for 7
Watched prog on C4+1 and very surprised no-one has already got this.
Watched prog on C4+1 and very surprised no-one has already got this.
- Fri Sep 25, 2009 6:18 am
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: More Sportsmen On Countdown
- Replies: 40
- Views: 4688
Re: More Sportsmen On Countdown
I seem to recall Rick Wakeman writing that he wouldn't go on the show again if they sacked Carol. Carol's gone, so presumably he won't be coming back.Jason Larsen wrote:Where is Rick Wakeman when we need him? Do I have to ask Kate Horton to invite him back again?
- Wed Jul 15, 2009 2:39 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Wednesday 15th July 2009
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2619
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 15th July 2009
R5
10, 7, 6, 5, 4, 1 925
6 x 4 = 24
24 + 1 = 25
25 x 7 = 175
175 + 10 = 185
185 x 5 = 925
Got it just as Ian Hyland was about to start talking.
10, 7, 6, 5, 4, 1 925
6 x 4 = 24
24 + 1 = 25
25 x 7 = 175
175 + 10 = 185
185 x 5 = 925
Got it just as Ian Hyland was about to start talking.
- Thu Jul 02, 2009 4:19 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Thursday July 2nd
- Replies: 20
- Views: 2240
Re: Spoilers for Thursday July 2nd
Probably posted by someone and got wiped but in R13 if Jeff got BASELINE, you could have had BASELINER for 9.
- Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:43 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Wednesday July 1st
- Replies: 26
- Views: 3288
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday July 1st
The reference to Hartlepool playing southampton next season may be a little unfortunate, given the events of the last couple of days.
- Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:11 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: spoilerz for Wednesday 24th June 2009
- Replies: 38
- Views: 3347
Re: spoilerz for Wednesday 24th June 2009
R14
(75 + (10*4))*5 - (3*2)
(75 + (10*4))*5 - (3*2)
- Sun May 31, 2009 6:58 am
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: Asperger Syndrome
- Replies: 81
- Views: 19826
Re: Asperger Syndrome
She does have unspecified learning difficulties due to oxygen deprivation at birth.Derek Hazell wrote:Does Susan Boyle have Asperger's, and what would she be like at Countdown?
- Thu May 14, 2009 7:33 am
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: Where Have The Greats Gone?
- Replies: 15
- Views: 2790
Re: Where Have The Greats Gone?
Clearly some people wouldn't know a life if it got up and hit them on the nose.Kirk Bevins wrote:What - by playing competitive Scrabble? Hmm...
- Wed May 13, 2009 9:12 pm
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: Where Have The Greats Gone?
- Replies: 15
- Views: 2790
Re: Where Have The Greats Gone?
I think they call it "getting a life".Ben Wilson wrote:Seems to happen to a lot of the greats, they retire early, become disinterested etc.
- Tue May 12, 2009 6:34 pm
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: Gender
- Replies: 44
- Views: 2914
Re: Gender
Another way of looking at this issue is to look at the performance of women in Countdown over the years, since it has become clear that it has become significantly more male-dominated in the last 8-10 years. In that time there have been only 3 female losing finalists, several of the finals and the C...
- Tue Apr 21, 2009 7:41 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Tuesday 21st April
- Replies: 29
- Views: 3624
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 21st April
Her opponenet in 2008, Michael MacDonald-Cooper, scored a total of 780, a decent, but not exceptional score for an octochamp. Similarly, her score of 73 was highly respectable, but not outstanding. Unless there is a general rule now, she wouldn't seem the most obvious candidate, apart from the fact ...
- Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:51 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Current recaps
- Topic: Tuesday 21st April 2009 (Series 60, Prelim 53)
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2218
Re: Tuesday 21st April 2009 (Series 60, Prelim 53)
This is presumably the first time that a game has involved two contestants for whom it was a second chance at appearing. It seems that it's almost become a rule, that if you're under 18 and lose to an octochamp in your first game you get a second chance. There seem to be more contestants appearing f...
- Wed Mar 04, 2009 8:09 am
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: Leeds - The Final Countdown?
- Replies: 80
- Views: 13902
Re: Leeds - The Final Countdown?
It would be sad if it moved, although, clearly, if they move because the Leeds studio is closed for economic reasons, this is different to moving for the convenience of the presenter.
- Fri Feb 06, 2009 4:13 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Friday February 6th 2009
- Replies: 67
- Views: 8931
Re: Spoilers for Friday February 6th 2009
Were you thinking what I was thinking after the first 6 letters of round 12?
Which were (not necessarily in right order) FTLLAE
Which were (not necessarily in right order) FTLLAE
- Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:44 pm
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: Rachel Riley Unveiled.
- Replies: 141
- Views: 19318
Re: Rachel Riley Unveiled.
On the subject of normal usage, there was an Indian-born contestant a few months ago who said '4 into 3' when she meant '4 times 3'. Having taught many Indian students, I can vouch that this is normal usage in India, because they all say it this way.
- Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:15 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Thursday 15 Jan 2009 (CoC Heat 4)
- Replies: 120
- Views: 10372
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 15 Jan 2009 (CoC Heat 4)
The most surprising thing about today's show was seeing Richard buzz in on the conundrum, since the Guardian feature a couple of weeks back put in a, doubtless inadvertent, spoiler for this game.
- Tue Jan 13, 2009 5:23 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009
- Replies: 27
- Views: 12963
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009
R5
10,9,8,6,5,4 Target 921
((6+5) x 10 +4) x 8 + 9 = 921
10,9,8,6,5,4 Target 921
((6+5) x 10 +4) x 8 + 9 = 921
- Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:37 pm
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: How-To Guides
- Replies: 172
- Views: 42352
Re: How-To Guides
On the numbers, working backwards, i.e. by factorising the target number, can work well and reveal solutions which you wouldn't find by working forward, but it does have the disadvantage, as has been pointed out, that if you can't hit the final factor spot-on, you don't have anything to declare. If ...