Search found 146 matches

by Malcolm James
Mon Mar 21, 2011 9:02 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Monday March 21st 2011
Replies: 11
Views: 2936

Re: Spoilers For Monday March 21st 2011

I thought WANTERS had previously been disallowed. Is it a new addition in ODE3?
by Malcolm James
Thu Mar 17, 2011 7:19 am
Forum: Countdown - Current recaps
Topic: Friday 11 March 2011 (Series 64, Prelim 45)
Replies: 16
Views: 3088

Re: Friday 11 March 2011 (Series 64, Prelim 45)

I thought that in these situations they mocked up a subsitute round at the end of the end to allow both contestants to declare an acceptable 6-letter word.
by Malcolm James
Thu Feb 24, 2011 5:02 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Thursday February 24th 2011
Replies: 18
Views: 4034

Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 24th 2011

R2 RENTBOY :D
R3 SEGUEING
by Malcolm James
Tue Feb 22, 2011 4:58 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Mike Spellars for Tuesday 22nd February 2011
Replies: 12
Views: 3039

Re: Mike Spellars for Tuesday 22nd February 2011

R10

7x5=35
35-3=32
32x6=192
192-7=185
185x5=925
by Malcolm James
Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:25 am
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Monday February 21st 2011
Replies: 18
Views: 3630

Re: Spoilers For Monday February 21st 2011

Especially considering that Dan is supposedly on the show later this week, so should remember that Mark Foster was in DC while he was there Erm, isn't this a spoiler, James, unless my counting up to eight is faulty? Andrew Castle was on a couple of weeks ago, so I don't see how this could be seen a...
by Malcolm James
Tue Feb 22, 2011 8:14 am
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Monday February 21st 2011
Replies: 18
Views: 3630

Re: Spoilers For Monday February 21st 2011

Dan McColm wrote:And why can't Andrew Castle sit still in the chair?
Don't know, particularly since this week's guest is Mark Foster.
by Malcolm James
Thu Feb 17, 2011 5:17 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Thursday February 17th 2011
Replies: 20
Views: 4062

Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 17th 2011

I know that 'rules are rules', but I was surprised that GOATIEST had to be specified. One-syllable adjectives and two-syllable adjectives ending in Y form the comparative and superlative using -ier and -iest ( http://www.grammar.cl/Intermediate/Comparatives_Superlatives.htm ). Other adjectives use '...
by Malcolm James
Sat Feb 12, 2011 2:05 pm
Forum: Countdown - General
Topic: Our Rachel's Getting Hitched!!
Replies: 20
Views: 2388

Re: Our Rachel's Getting Hitched!!

Monday is Valentine's day and the start of week 6 of the series, and thus presumably of the second session of filming. Soooooo?
by Malcolm James
Fri Feb 04, 2011 3:56 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Friday February 4th 2011
Replies: 27
Views: 4384

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 4th 2011

And what precisely is a MEGALITRE? Surely a litre is a litre is a litre?
by Malcolm James
Tue Jan 25, 2011 4:57 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Tuesday January 25th 2011
Replies: 12
Views: 2614

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday January 25th 2011

Someone will be sad enough to know this. When was the last time that 9s came up in successive rounds on successive days? Also, unless I missed something, Susie didn't really give the origin of the word 'jeans' itself. I believe it derives from 'gênes', from the French for Genoa.
by Malcolm James
Thu Dec 09, 2010 4:30 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Thursday December 9th 2010
Replies: 13
Views: 2952

Re: Spoilers For Thursday December 9th 2010

Way out of time, but closer still for R14

(9+1)x7 = 70

70-2 = 68

68x6x2 = 816

Haven't checked, but suspect this is closest possible.
by Malcolm James
Fri Nov 19, 2010 4:15 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Friday November 19th 2010
Replies: 7
Views: 2121

Re: Spoilers For Friday November 19th 2010

R14

(((7+3)x6)-1)x7x2=826

This is the best you can do.
by Malcolm James
Mon Nov 15, 2010 5:12 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Monday November 15th 2010
Replies: 18
Views: 2465

Re: Spoilers For Monday November 15th 2010

When did we last have a female contestant under the age of 18? I remember someone winning 2 or 3 games around about 2003, but I may have missed someone.
by Malcolm James
Fri Oct 22, 2010 6:51 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Friday October 22nd 2010
Replies: 75
Views: 11673

Re: Spoilers For Friday October 22nd 2010

Michael Wallace wrote:Lastly didn't the challenger say VESTAGE^ which isn't in? Would he have guessed VESTIGE?
It could have been either, and, since by that time he didn't have even a mathematical chance of winning, I suppose Susie couldn't see any point in challenging him.
by Malcolm James
Fri Oct 08, 2010 3:50 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Friday October 8th 2010
Replies: 6
Views: 1421

Re: Spoilers For Friday October 8th 2010

R7 WARBLIER

I suspect Susie was too kind to mention it, since they had an alternative 8.
by Malcolm James
Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:40 am
Forum: Countdown - Current recaps
Topic: Thursday 2nd September 2010 (Series 63, Prelim 39)
Replies: 5
Views: 1163

Re: Thursday 2nd September 2010 (Series 63, Prelim 39)

There was only one round (R14) in which both contestants scored. Is this a record?
by Malcolm James
Tue Aug 10, 2010 3:28 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Tuesday August 10th 2010
Replies: 13
Views: 2428

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday August 10th 2010

Is TWOCED (taking without consent) valid in (I think) R10?
by Malcolm James
Fri Aug 06, 2010 4:09 pm
Forum: Countdown - Current recaps
Topic: Tuesday 27th April 2010 (Series 62, Prelim 72)
Replies: 6
Views: 1219

Re: Tuesday 27th April 2010 (Series 62, Prelim 72)

Having watched the repeat, the recap for R14 is wrong. The target was 608 and the contestants both got 610 for 2 away.
by Malcolm James
Wed May 26, 2010 4:16 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Wednesday May 26th 2010
Replies: 11
Views: 2188

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday May 26th 2010

R14

((50 + 100/25) x 8) - 75

Switched off after conundrum, so trust Rachel didn't get this one at the end.
by Malcolm James
Sun May 23, 2010 7:06 am
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Friday May 21st 2010
Replies: 14
Views: 2328

Re: Spoilers For Friday May 21st 2010

I had already switched off, so didn't see that. Is it my imagination, or does Rachel either get, or get the chance to show, solutions to numbers games out of time far more often than Carol did? Initially I thought it was because the production team wanted to give her every chance to show she had sol...
by Malcolm James
Sat May 22, 2010 5:17 am
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Friday May 21st 2010
Replies: 14
Views: 2328

Re: Spoilers For Friday May 21st 2010

R14
((25 * (7 - 4)) + 4) * 7 + 9 = 562
by Malcolm James
Tue May 11, 2010 6:24 am
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Monday May 10th 2010
Replies: 14
Views: 2044

Re: Spoilers For Monday May 10th 2010

James Robinson wrote:That was probably one of the most surprising comebacks of all time
Is this because the comeback was by a more mature lady against a younger man? ;)
by Malcolm James
Fri Apr 30, 2010 2:55 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Friday 30th April 2010
Replies: 12
Views: 1998

Re: Spoilers For Friday 30th April 2010

Didn't write down the letters, but have a horrible feeling now that there was only one E in R1.
by Malcolm James
Fri Apr 30, 2010 2:37 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Friday 30th April 2010
Replies: 12
Views: 1998

Re: Spoilers For Friday 30th April 2010

R1 RELIQUES
by Malcolm James
Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:40 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Tuesday March 9th 2010
Replies: 33
Views: 5095

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday March 9th 2010

Not a fan of the "I've finished the numbers game so I'm going to sit back and give my opponent a hint that I've done it and that it's pretty easy". It's not so much that it looks smug (unless it's really, really easy), but it can help the opponent knowing that it's possible. It applies ev...
by Malcolm James
Fri Mar 05, 2010 3:39 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Friday March 5th 2010
Replies: 27
Views: 3761

Re: Spoilers For Friday March 5th 2010

R3

OBTUSELY
by Malcolm James
Wed Feb 17, 2010 9:56 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers for Wednesday 17th Feb
Replies: 93
Views: 22990

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 17th Feb

If a contestant offered CHOLIAMBS they'd be wrong, unless of course they happened to be playing you, in which case they'd be awarded double points, or however many it took to make sure your preposterously quibbly personality never appeared on our screens again. Nothing personal of course, but you r...
by Malcolm James
Tue Feb 16, 2010 4:54 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Tuesday February 16th 2010
Replies: 29
Views: 2939

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday February 16th 2010

Jojo Apollo wrote:How long a break is there between each of those 5 filmed episodes?
Usually filmed on consecutive days, but if you happen to be at the end of a filming session, the break could be several weeks.
by Malcolm James
Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:48 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Thursday February 11th 2010
Replies: 43
Views: 4058

Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 11th 2010

Gavin Chipper wrote:Kirk Bevins wrote:
Malcolm James wrote:
R14

(50 + ((7 - 1) x 4)) x (10 + 3) = 962


Again, I'll assume this was out of time?
How dare you insult me like that! It was within the time. :D
by Malcolm James
Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:14 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Thursday February 11th 2010
Replies: 43
Views: 4058

Re: Spoilers For Thursday February 11th 2010

R14

(50 + ((7 - 1) x 4)) x (10 + 3) = 962
by Malcolm James
Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:44 am
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Friday January 22nd 2010
Replies: 43
Views: 3619

Re: Spoilers For Friday January 22nd 2010

Actually I think the winner was the reserve contestant, because he was local to the studio. the loser came from London.
by Malcolm James
Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:24 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers for Tuesday December 8th 2009
Replies: 35
Views: 4189

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday December 8th 2009

R9 DC Beater

DONORCIDE - I'm surprised Phil Hammond didn't spot it. It would solve the organ transplnt problem.
by Malcolm James
Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:31 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoiler for Friday November 27th 2009
Replies: 57
Views: 4754

Re: Spoiler for Friday November 27th 2009

Nice alternative for R5

(100/5 - 1) x ((6 x 2) + 7) = 361
by Malcolm James
Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:07 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoiler for Friday November 27th 2009
Replies: 57
Views: 4754

Re: Spoiler for Friday November 27th 2009

R1 DC-equaller WOOLLENS
R12 DC-beater HEIRESS
by Malcolm James
Fri Nov 27, 2009 1:00 pm
Forum: Countdown - Current recaps
Topic: Thursday 26th November 2009 (Series 61, Prelim 94)
Replies: 1
Views: 797

Re: Thursday 26th November 2009 (Series 61, Prelim 94)

There seems to be a pattern here. I can think of four or five young(ish) female contestant in the last couple of years who, like batsmen putting together a fluent 40 before getting out, look strong in winning two or three games before losing. Not to say that there aren't men like that, but this is p...
by Malcolm James
Tue Nov 10, 2009 12:09 pm
Forum: Countdown - General
Topic: Ram
Replies: 19
Views: 2941

Re: Ram

Sue Sanders wrote: If there's ever a 'Dorothy' on, block your ears when they call her 'Dotty'!
And I expect Dinos to be very offended every time there's a Pippa on.
by Malcolm James
Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:08 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers For Friday November 6th 2009
Replies: 50
Views: 5543

Re: Spoilers For Friday November 6th 2009

R14
6x3x2 = 30
30+4=34
8+5=13
34X13= 442
by Malcolm James
Fri Oct 23, 2009 2:40 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers for Friday October 23rd 2009
Replies: 21
Views: 3115

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 23rd 2009

Also in R2 or 3 DC's offering of ORATOR is only 6, not 7, unless I misheard.
by Malcolm James
Tue Oct 20, 2009 8:57 am
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: What is the point...
Replies: 83
Views: 7984

Re: What is the point...

Anyone remember Martin Gardner, who used to post frequently? IIRC he only appeared on the show as a reserve because he lived in Leeds at the times, and he ended up an octochamp. Against that, there must be any number of people who scored well in auditions, but who didn't perform well in the studio. ...
by Malcolm James
Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:18 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers for Monday 5th October
Replies: 52
Views: 6020

Re: Spoilers for Monday 5th October

R13: FRIEZES for 7

Watched prog on C4+1 and very surprised no-one has already got this.
by Malcolm James
Fri Sep 25, 2009 6:18 am
Forum: Countdown - General
Topic: More Sportsmen On Countdown
Replies: 40
Views: 4688

Re: More Sportsmen On Countdown

Jason Larsen wrote:Where is Rick Wakeman when we need him? Do I have to ask Kate Horton to invite him back again?
I seem to recall Rick Wakeman writing that he wouldn't go on the show again if they sacked Carol. Carol's gone, so presumably he won't be coming back.
by Malcolm James
Wed Jul 15, 2009 2:39 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers for Wednesday 15th July 2009
Replies: 12
Views: 2619

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 15th July 2009

R5
10, 7, 6, 5, 4, 1 925

6 x 4 = 24
24 + 1 = 25

25 x 7 = 175
175 + 10 = 185

185 x 5 = 925

Got it just as Ian Hyland was about to start talking.
by Malcolm James
Thu Jul 02, 2009 4:19 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers for Thursday July 2nd
Replies: 20
Views: 2240

Re: Spoilers for Thursday July 2nd

Probably posted by someone and got wiped but in R13 if Jeff got BASELINE, you could have had BASELINER for 9.
by Malcolm James
Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:43 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers for Wednesday July 1st
Replies: 26
Views: 3288

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday July 1st

The reference to Hartlepool playing southampton next season may be a little unfortunate, given the events of the last couple of days.
by Malcolm James
Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:11 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: spoilerz for Wednesday 24th June 2009
Replies: 38
Views: 3347

Re: spoilerz for Wednesday 24th June 2009

R14
(75 + (10*4))*5 - (3*2)
by Malcolm James
Sun May 31, 2009 6:58 am
Forum: Countdown - General
Topic: Asperger Syndrome
Replies: 81
Views: 19826

Re: Asperger Syndrome

Derek Hazell wrote:Does Susan Boyle have Asperger's, and what would she be like at Countdown?
She does have unspecified learning difficulties due to oxygen deprivation at birth.
by Malcolm James
Thu May 14, 2009 7:33 am
Forum: Countdown - General
Topic: Where Have The Greats Gone?
Replies: 15
Views: 2790

Re: Where Have The Greats Gone?

Kirk Bevins wrote:What - by playing competitive Scrabble? Hmm...
Clearly some people wouldn't know a life if it got up and hit them on the nose.
by Malcolm James
Wed May 13, 2009 9:12 pm
Forum: Countdown - General
Topic: Where Have The Greats Gone?
Replies: 15
Views: 2790

Re: Where Have The Greats Gone?

Ben Wilson wrote:Seems to happen to a lot of the greats, they retire early, become disinterested etc.
I think they call it "getting a life".
by Malcolm James
Tue May 12, 2009 6:34 pm
Forum: Countdown - General
Topic: Gender
Replies: 44
Views: 2914

Re: Gender

Another way of looking at this issue is to look at the performance of women in Countdown over the years, since it has become clear that it has become significantly more male-dominated in the last 8-10 years. In that time there have been only 3 female losing finalists, several of the finals and the C...
by Malcolm James
Tue Apr 21, 2009 7:41 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers for Tuesday 21st April
Replies: 29
Views: 3624

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 21st April

Her opponenet in 2008, Michael MacDonald-Cooper, scored a total of 780, a decent, but not exceptional score for an octochamp. Similarly, her score of 73 was highly respectable, but not outstanding. Unless there is a general rule now, she wouldn't seem the most obvious candidate, apart from the fact ...
by Malcolm James
Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:51 pm
Forum: Countdown - Current recaps
Topic: Tuesday 21st April 2009 (Series 60, Prelim 53)
Replies: 12
Views: 2218

Re: Tuesday 21st April 2009 (Series 60, Prelim 53)

This is presumably the first time that a game has involved two contestants for whom it was a second chance at appearing. It seems that it's almost become a rule, that if you're under 18 and lose to an octochamp in your first game you get a second chance. There seem to be more contestants appearing f...
by Malcolm James
Wed Mar 04, 2009 8:09 am
Forum: Countdown - General
Topic: Leeds - The Final Countdown?
Replies: 80
Views: 13902

Re: Leeds - The Final Countdown?

It would be sad if it moved, although, clearly, if they move because the Leeds studio is closed for economic reasons, this is different to moving for the convenience of the presenter.
by Malcolm James
Fri Feb 06, 2009 4:13 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers for Friday February 6th 2009
Replies: 67
Views: 8931

Re: Spoilers for Friday February 6th 2009

Were you thinking what I was thinking after the first 6 letters of round 12?

Which were (not necessarily in right order) FTLLAE
by Malcolm James
Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:44 pm
Forum: Countdown - General
Topic: Rachel Riley Unveiled.
Replies: 141
Views: 19318

Re: Rachel Riley Unveiled.

On the subject of normal usage, there was an Indian-born contestant a few months ago who said '4 into 3' when she meant '4 times 3'. Having taught many Indian students, I can vouch that this is normal usage in India, because they all say it this way.
by Malcolm James
Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:15 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers for Thursday 15 Jan 2009 (CoC Heat 4)
Replies: 120
Views: 10372

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 15 Jan 2009 (CoC Heat 4)

The most surprising thing about today's show was seeing Richard buzz in on the conundrum, since the Guardian feature a couple of weeks back put in a, doubtless inadvertent, spoiler for this game.
by Malcolm James
Tue Jan 13, 2009 5:23 pm
Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
Topic: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009
Replies: 27
Views: 12963

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009

R5
10,9,8,6,5,4 Target 921

((6+5) x 10 +4) x 8 + 9 = 921
by Malcolm James
Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:37 pm
Forum: Countdown - General
Topic: How-To Guides
Replies: 172
Views: 42352

Re: How-To Guides

On the numbers, working backwards, i.e. by factorising the target number, can work well and reveal solutions which you wouldn't find by working forward, but it does have the disadvantage, as has been pointed out, that if you can't hit the final factor spot-on, you don't have anything to declare. If ...