Just checked: LittersJohnny Canuck wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2017 1:38 pm Does anyone have confirmation (e.g., via subtitles) of James' word in the LOTTERY/TOILETRY round? I heard it pretty clearly as LITTERS but it could have been LOITERS.
Search found 642 matches
- Thu Oct 26, 2017 2:09 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Thursday 26 October 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 82)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4972
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26 October 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 82)
- Tue Oct 24, 2017 2:40 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for the 24th October 2017
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5987
Re: Spoilers for the 24th October 2017
3rd Numbers Reducing the Number of Numbers Alt.: (50 - 1) * (9 + 3 + 2) Same idea, but did 9 - 3 + 6 + 2 for the 14. I didn't want to reduce the number of numbers! Actually that's a lie, I didn't see your way! I had pompier - as in more pompy - I'm a Pompey supporter so I can, ha ha :-) Doesn't mat...
- Sun Oct 15, 2017 7:26 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Wednesday, 11th October 2017
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4560
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday, 11th October 2017
I use Lexplorer, but you can only use it if you are a member on the site "Apterous". Alternatively,http://incoherency.co.uk/countdown/ is a quick one which I may use in the break but doesn't have the full dictionary, so you may type the word in and it won't come up on there, but could act...
- Sat Oct 14, 2017 8:03 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Thursday 12th October 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 72)
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6486
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th October 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 72)
Seedings must be the most used word to ever be disallowed on Countdown.David Williams wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2017 11:22 pm Certainly unlucky. A search for SEEDINGS in this forum reveals 207 matches.
- Sat Oct 14, 2017 7:59 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Wednesday, 11th October 2017
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4560
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday, 11th October 2017
What do you use to check your words when you play along? The site I thought we used either has the word, says there is no match, or just defaults to another (close) word. In the last case I never know if the word is valid or not.
- Fri Oct 06, 2017 9:43 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Tuesday, 3 October 2017
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4377
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 3 October 2017
Souvenir in that round too. (probably on wiki by now but I'm a few days behind, )Johnny Canuck wrote: ↑Tue Oct 03, 2017 2:10 pmBRUNOISE too. Turns out I did in fact learn something from Bellodown.
- Thu Oct 05, 2017 11:24 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Monday 2 October 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 64)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4943
Re: Spoilers for Monday 2 October 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 64)
Little bit of inside info about this game... Jacob was a last minute stand-in player. Someone by the name of Emily (not Cox! ;)) got cold feet and pulled out on the day. So fair play to him for stepping up. When Jacob was being introduced he told us what he was going to be doing next week. I expect...
- Tue Oct 03, 2017 4:25 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Thursday 28th September 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 62)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5340
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 28th September 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 62)
The K is back again!
- Fri Sep 22, 2017 10:02 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Friday 22nd September 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 58)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3142
Re: Spoilers for Friday 22nd September 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 58)
Thanks. I spent 28 seconds trying to make a 2 without the 100 or 7!
- Wed Sep 20, 2017 11:00 am
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Birthday Championship Spoilers For Tuesday February 5th 2013
- Replies: 86
- Views: 26251
Re: Birthday Championship Spoilers For Tuesday February 5th 2013
Hi! I just read this whole thread and remember this episode and Jack saying that about the A. I don't think I would have been offended tbh and for me as a viewer it was helpful, telling me there must be a 9 there so look harder! It's like when I haven't seen a numbers solution but see Rachel sitting...
- Thu Sep 14, 2017 2:56 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Thursday 14th September 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 52)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2860
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 14th September 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 52)
Where's the K gone again? Hasn't been out since Monday.
- Tue Sep 12, 2017 2:42 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Tuesday 12th September 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 50)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4518
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 12th September 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 50)
Sounded like it to me too - and the subtitler.Zarte Siempre wrote: ↑Tue Sep 12, 2017 1:32 pm Did she just say that MARRIES was a dodgy 7? And was there some dodgy editing around it? Or is that just me?
- Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:34 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Monday September 11th
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2908
Re: Spoilers for Monday September 11th
My way to 334 was (8x9-5)x5-1
- Wed Sep 06, 2017 8:30 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Wednesday 6th September 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 46)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3581
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 6th September 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 46)
Yesssss! And everybody used it! Let's have 2!
Rachel seemed to have a problem with some of the letters going on the board too.
- Wed Aug 30, 2017 2:40 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Wednesday 30 August 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 41)
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6584
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 30 August 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 41)
"You can make 904 with the same ingredients... " That's kind of how the numbers game works, Rachel. Also, did anyone find it kind of strange that she used the 4 without showing the 6 - 2 step? I took Rachel to mean she was using the 4 and the 1 the champ had made but in a different way. T...
- Mon Aug 28, 2017 8:45 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Bank Holiday Monday 28th August 2017
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2798
Re: Spoilers for Bank Holiday Monday 28th August 2017
75 x 10 - (50/25 x 7 + 3) works in the 1st numbers round too.
- Fri Aug 18, 2017 7:28 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Friday 18th August 2017
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4110
Re: Spoilers for Friday 18th August 2017
My way to 372 was (10 x 75 - 6) / 100/50
- Wed Aug 16, 2017 10:38 am
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Friday 11th August 2017
- Replies: 18
- Views: 13698
Re: Spoilers for Friday 11th August 2017
The alternatives being to say "oh no, I'm wrong" or give your corrected answer and then tell Nick you thought it was something else before you buzzed? (somewhat like the case with Richard Whiteley). She had to make her decision quickly and may have regretted it after, specially if it had b...
- Wed Aug 16, 2017 10:28 am
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Tuesday, 15th August 2017
- Replies: 16
- Views: 11031
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 15th August 2017
Me too! But I wasn't going to admit it! I just assumed they were like 'baps' you get from bakers!Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Tue Aug 15, 2017 10:14 pm I was totally unaware that FAPS was a word. I mean, literally no-one has ever used it, so why would I know it? It was only after I looked it up that I found out what it was.
- Tue Aug 15, 2017 2:58 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Tuesday, 15th August 2017
- Replies: 16
- Views: 11031
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 15th August 2017
Can't you order 2 iodines in a restaurant then? Maybe there should be a pharmacy rule.
- Sat Aug 12, 2017 9:22 am
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Friday 11th August 2017
- Replies: 18
- Views: 13698
Re: Spoilers for Friday 11th August 2017
Bit of a change of mind on the conundrum? No objection from Nick. Aye, she did seem to take rather a long time to give the actual answer. To me it looked like she thought she had the answer then while Nick was talking realised that was incorrect. Then she worked out the correct answer. I was please...
- Fri Aug 04, 2017 2:00 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Friday 4 August 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 24)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2753
Re: Spoilers for Friday 4 August 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 24)
Well I just did (25 + 9 - 5) x 10) + 100/50 so I can't believe Rachel didn't get it with the extra time
- Fri Aug 04, 2017 1:55 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Friday 4 August 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 24)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2753
- Thu Aug 03, 2017 5:11 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Thursday, 3rd August 2017
- Replies: 15
- Views: 10495
Re: Spoilers for Thursday, 3rd August 2017
I thought it was funny that Rachel did 46 x 6 + 6 instead of 47 x 6, when it was just as "cheap" to get the 47 as it was to get the 46. She did 9x5+7-6 instead of 9x5+8-6. Yes, or even 8 x 5 + 7 or 9 x 6 - 7. Which is what I was trying to say just now, lol :-) Yes, that would be even bett...
- Thu Aug 03, 2017 3:02 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Thursday, 3rd August 2017
- Replies: 15
- Views: 10495
Re: Spoilers for Thursday, 3rd August 2017
Yes, or even 8 x 5 + 7 or 9 x 6 - 7. Which is what I was trying to say just now, lolGavin Chipper wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:57 pm I thought it was funny that Rachel did 46 x 6 + 6 instead of 47 x 6, when it was just as "cheap" to get the 47 as it was to get the 46. She did 9x5+7-6 instead of 9x5+8-6.
- Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:51 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Thursday, 3rd August 2017
- Replies: 15
- Views: 10495
Re: Spoilers for Thursday, 3rd August 2017
Spent most of the time looking for 47 for 47 x 6, then 8 x 5 + 7 almost appeared. Then I saw 9 x 6 - 7 too.Tony Atkins wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:00 pm Like the players, I missed that 6/(9-6) is 2 to add to the 280 and did (5x8-(6/6))x7+9
- Wed Aug 02, 2017 2:22 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Wednesday 2nd August 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 22)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5147
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 2nd August 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 22)
Has anyone else noticed that Nick's spiel asking people to apply for Countdown (typically read just after the first commercial break) is just a recording? Every time it's played, he makes pauses/hesitations in the same places, most notably saying "If you'd like to become a -- a Countdown conte...
- Wed Aug 02, 2017 12:13 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Monday 31st July 2017
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4029
Re: Spoilers for Monday 31st July 2017
Good to see there's life after last Thursday ;) Anyone else think Rachel should show the nearest available in the impossible numbers games? It happens sometimes but not usually. I imagine (((1 + 2) x 3 x 9) + 2) x 7 was her way for 581. It's quite inconsistent. She does it occasionally but most of ...
- Tue Aug 01, 2017 2:22 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Monday 31st July 2017
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4029
Re: Spoilers for Monday 31st July 2017
Good to see there's life after last Thursday
Anyone else think Rachel should show the nearest available in the impossible numbers games? It happens sometimes but not usually.
I imagine (((1 + 2) x 3 x 9) + 2) x 7 was her way for 581.
Anyone else think Rachel should show the nearest available in the impossible numbers games? It happens sometimes but not usually.
I imagine (((1 + 2) x 3 x 9) + 2) x 7 was her way for 581.
- Thu Jul 27, 2017 2:47 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Thursday 27 July 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 186)
- Replies: 21
- Views: 16862
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 27 July 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 186)
I made use of that handy 69 too - very useful!Tony Atkins wrote: ↑Thu Jul 27, 2017 1:55 pm Pleased to not only beat John today but also beat Rachel on the third numbers.
Also did the first numbers the easy way of 69x10-1.
Seeing I'm here I may as well declare my last numbers: (75 + 25 - 10 - 7) x 5. Hate 2L!
- Wed Jul 26, 2017 11:08 am
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: Former contestants
- Replies: 16
- Views: 10417
Re: Former contestants
Yep, will sort something out. Pretty poor sound quality I have to say but watchable.
- Wed Jul 26, 2017 10:32 am
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: Former contestants
- Replies: 16
- Views: 10417
Re: Former contestants
Glen Webb got back on in 2013 after being in the QFs in 1992; thus, logically, I'd think you would have a shot now. The one sticky point is that you were an octochamp on your original appearance, while Webb only won 2 games, and you'd be looking at becoming the first former octochamp to be invited ...
- Mon Jul 24, 2017 2:12 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Monday 24 July 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 15)
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7120
Re: Spoilers for Monday 24 July 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 15)
Also 100 x 6 + 25 x 10 - 4
and one of the 6s:
((8 + 1) x 8 - 4/4) x 9 = 639
- Tue Jul 18, 2017 10:02 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Thursday 13 July 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 9)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3582
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 13 July 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 9)
Ah yes, I wasn't going to mention that!
- Tue Jul 18, 2017 3:21 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Thursday 13 July 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 9)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3582
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 13 July 2017 (Series 77, Prelim 9)
As Nick was asking who in the audience could solve the conundrum I said 'Anthony Endsor' ! Ok, I spotted him a few days ago but it was still a bit spooky!
- Sun Jul 16, 2017 12:49 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Tuesday 11th July 2017
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2779
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 11th July 2017
OMNIBUSES to beat DC's NIMBUSES in R1 TIDELESS in R10 Didn't get omnibuses in the 30 secs tbh, but after SD said it and RR put it up with the O left over, it was pretty hard Not to see it! Rigoletto was in one round, ok, a proper noun, but looking it up found rigolet, which beat DC, but not Laura's...
- Tue Jul 04, 2017 8:34 pm
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: New set
- Replies: 10
- Views: 9522
Re: New set
Anyone else noticed that when we see letters selections on tv during the 30 seconds, the outside edges of the end letter tiles are cut off, so those letters don't appear in the middle of their tiles?
Doesn't look right imo
Doesn't look right imo
- Tue Jun 27, 2017 9:59 am
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Monday 26th June 2017 (Series 76, QF3)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4497
Re: Spoilers for Monday 26th June 2017 (Series 76, QF3)
Waiter: Would you like a dusting of icing sugar on your sponge sir?
Customer: I'd like 2 dustings of icing sugar on my sponge please!
Waiter: Sorry sir, you can have One dusting of icing sugar on your sponge, followed by another dusting of icing sugar on your sponge.
Customer: I'd like 2 dustings of icing sugar on my sponge please!
Waiter: Sorry sir, you can have One dusting of icing sugar on your sponge, followed by another dusting of icing sugar on your sponge.
- Tue Jun 13, 2017 11:33 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Tuesday 13 June 2017
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4645
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13 June 2017
875 = 50 × 7 × (8 − 6) × 5 ÷ 4 Maybe Rachel saw this late. Can't help thinking that multiplying by 2 and dividing by 4 is a sub-optimal solution. Maybe showboating? It was basically 50/2 × 35. If you're not showboating you'd divide by 2 first and never go above the target. Maybe she did see it late...
- Fri Jun 02, 2017 10:20 am
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Friday, 26 May 2017
- Replies: 14
- Views: 11311
Re: Spoilers for Friday, 26 May 2017
In a similar vein, I saw CORRALED a few days ago. If you look it up, it takes you to CORRAL, exactly the same as if you look up CORRALLED. The old print dictionary specifies CORRALLED, and the Introduction to the ODE says that if nothing is specified in the entry for the word, the correct version w...
- Thu Jun 01, 2017 12:11 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Friday, 26 May 2017
- Replies: 14
- Views: 11311
Re: Spoilers for Friday, 26 May 2017
In one of the rounds I saw defamity. Not being sure it's a word I checked on the site I think we use, https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/ - and it defaulted to defamer. It didn't say 'no exact match' though, which I usually see! So was I right or wrong? It's not valid on Apterous but that's not nece...
- Wed May 31, 2017 9:16 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Friday, 26 May 2017
- Replies: 14
- Views: 11311
Re: Spoilers for Friday, 26 May 2017
In one of the rounds I saw defamity. Not being sure it's a word I checked on the site I think we use, https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/ - and it defaulted to defamer. It didn't say 'no exact match' though, which I usually see! So was I right or wrong?
- Fri May 12, 2017 2:41 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Tuesday 2nd May
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2010
Re: Tuesday 2nd May
Thought that was weird too! I only see clung in an example sentence but I maybe not looking at the right site!
Darrens was in the yonders round for an apteristic seven though, lol
Darrens was in the yonders round for an apteristic seven though, lol
- Thu May 11, 2017 7:33 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Monday 1st May 2017
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2308
Re: Spoilers for Monday 1st May 2017
Looking at the link there, the last letters game is interesting. As in today's last letters game the words offered were 'girates' with an *i* (disallowed) and 'astride'!
- Mon May 08, 2017 7:53 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Tuesday 25th April 2017
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4898
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 25th April 2017
The "basic" way, or standard method, was
(((9x(6-2))+1)x25)+5 though, wasn't it?
Probably too many brackets there, lol.
- Fri May 05, 2017 2:59 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Thursday 20th April 2017
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2408
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 20th April 2017
Could do with avoiding 4 large too, which cost him twice! If Berkan had not missed the first easyish numbers and seen isolated Nick would have lost.
Yep I'm 15 days behind, I need C4 to get the racing back to catch up, lol
Yep I'm 15 days behind, I need C4 to get the racing back to catch up, lol
- Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:35 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Tuesday 14 March 2017
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4691
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14 March 2017
In cases like this it's nice to see what the subtitler put - which was torturous, but then I guess that's not conclusive.
Anyway, Sam was pretty unlucky to come up against the strongest player for a while.
(Only a week behind now!)
Anyway, Sam was pretty unlucky to come up against the strongest player for a while.
(Only a week behind now!)
- Thu Mar 09, 2017 6:42 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Wednesday 1st March 2017
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3013
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 1st March 2017
ratwig is not valid by the way in case anyone was wondering. It might seem obvious, but they should have been explicit and not put it on the board! You could see Susie seemingly looking it up but she didn't subsequently say anything after Len rambled on about it. Ragwort was available in that round...
- Sat Mar 04, 2017 11:01 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Wednesday 22 February 2017
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1881
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22 February 2017
Moderately surprised unsoaped isn't in for the spawned round.
- Mon Feb 27, 2017 3:25 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Thursday 16th February 2017
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2290
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 16th February 2017
Not necessarily better but seeing we're saying, lol, 1st numbers alternative: ((7+1)x3x10)+9-4.
- Wed Feb 22, 2017 8:52 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Tuesday, 14 February 2017
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2014
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 14 February 2017
Second numbers without difficult calculations en route would be:
((5 x 2 x 10 - 7) x 10) + 8.
((5 x 2 x 10 - 7) x 10) + 8.
- Sat Feb 18, 2017 11:07 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Thursday 9th February 2017
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1664
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 9th February 2017
IMO, the wiki needs a better system for recording ambiguous words (e.g., METRE/METER and BOARD/BORED from Carl today) than putting them all in notes at the top of the page. We've had four examples in the past two days now. ABLATIVES and ASSARTED as beaters to SALIVATE and whatever the frak DC got i...
- Sat Feb 11, 2017 12:14 am
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Monday 6th February 2017
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3714
Re: Spoilers for Monday 6th February 2017
Did Tony call 4 large a "Stelling Selection"? Not sure I've heard that term before, nor can I think of what connections 4L in particular has to Jeff. I wondered about that too, and thought maybe I'd just forgotten. The Jeff connection with 4L is it's the same as "too" small :-)
- Wed Jan 25, 2017 12:36 am
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Tuesday 24th January 2017
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2466
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 24 January 2017 (Series 76, Prelim 11)
Thought I recognised Dave straight away but from another quiz/game show and can't think which.
Sam said he would stick with a 6 in the unsubtle round, maybe that's what he had. DC not mentioning it and only declaring 7s made it look like it wouldn't have been in.
Sam said he would stick with a 6 in the unsubtle round, maybe that's what he had. DC not mentioning it and only declaring 7s made it look like it wouldn't have been in.
- Sat Jan 21, 2017 9:13 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Friday 20 January 2017 (Series 76, Prelim 9)
- Replies: 16
- Views: 10079
Re: Spoilers for Friday 20 January 2017 (Series 76, Prelim 9)
Thanks for posting. I don't feel bad at all about not getting that!
- Fri Jan 20, 2017 11:12 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Friday 20 January 2017 (Series 76, Prelim 9)
- Replies: 16
- Views: 10079
Re: Spoilers for Friday 20 January 2017 (Series 76, Prelim 9)
Noticed the hand too, and yesterday. Was going to say it was good of Rachel for once to be seen to refer back to the numbers game she was left with. Not seen that before, even though she didn't actually have homework after all! Are we going to see the solution? :-) My 760 was (25-6) x (50-9-1) but a...
- Wed Jan 18, 2017 11:27 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Wednesday 18 January 2017 (Series 76, Prelim 7)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1510
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 18 January 2017 (Series 76, Prelim 7)
Only a 6 but there was a heifer in the hewer round
- Tue Jan 17, 2017 5:16 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Tuesday 17 January 2017 (Series 76, Prelim 6)
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2856
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 17 January 2017 (Series 76, Prelim 6)
1st numbers alt.: 75 * 7 - 50 - 6 / 2 Susie mentioned FRAGILE in the FRAILER round but didn't actually note that it was available in the selection. For purposes of the wiki, I've left it un-asterisked. Hope nobody is overly traumatised by this. Had farries in that round but apparently that's not wh...
- Mon Jan 16, 2017 5:24 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Monday 16 January 2017 (Series 76, Prelim 5)
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3695
Re: Spoilers for Monday 16 January 2017 (Series 76, Prelim 5)
He did. Really enjoyable match today too, shame someone had to lose.Johnny Canuck wrote: ↑Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:25 pm Did Heerpal say LOUDEST in Round 2? A Non-Countdown Acquaintance™ passed by my desk and I had to talk over his word.
- Thu Jan 05, 2017 3:56 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Thursday 5th January 2017
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2602
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 5th January 2017
Paternal from Darren and maternal from Suzy would have been nice in the parental/prenatal round!