Search found 582 matches
- Tue Sep 01, 2009 8:03 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Tuesday September 1st 2009
- Replies: 40
- Views: 4292
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday September 1st 2009
BINAURAL for round 3. Thanks, Pearl Jam. Posting before DC spoils my fun... EDIT: Fuck you DC. And I thought I had a DC-equaller with RUINABLE^ (which is in Chambers) until I checked Lexplorer, so similar sentiments towards ODE. The letters today certainly favoured someone with knowledge of unusual...
Re: Religion
I don't wish to speak for Kieran, but I think "agnostic" is the term he (and I) would say is out of place in the poll. Really? :shock: That to me seems to be the converse of Kieran's position. If what you say is true, then when Kieran said that not all agnostics are atheists, what term sh...
Re: Religion
I did a Google on "wife's toys", but wasn't quite sure if what came up was appropriate for here.Matt Morrison wrote:+1. This is much more my level.Chris Corby wrote:My wife's toys come to life when I am not watching.
Re: Religion
Chris, the problem with indisputible facts is that the religious have a tendency to dispute them. http://www.bible.ca/tracks/tracks.htm ... and Occam's Razor goes out of the window. I gave up debates with religious types a long time ago - they only proved what lengths apparently intelligent people ...
Re: Religion
Of course toys come to life. You need proof?Jon Corby wrote:Do you "know" that all your toys don't come to life when nobody's watching?
Re: Dilemmas
I'm confused as to whose eye is going to fall out as a result of this action.Sue Sanders wrote:up your arseIan Volante wrote:Where to you have to put you finger to make that happen then?Sue Sanders wrote: It seems it doesn't matter HOW far I push my finger up my nose, my eye DOESN' T fall out .
Re: Dilemmas
They're not dilemmas, they're A-level questions.Jason Larsen wrote:My dilemmas involve questions with the answers yes or no.
- Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:12 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Can someone clarify the exact rules on spoliers?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 2869
Re: Can someone clarify the exact rules on spoliers?
... and it's quite easy to get your tongue round.Matt Morrison wrote:I didn't mention it because I think it sounds nice, kind of French or something.
- Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:24 pm
- Forum: Off-topic
- Topic: Classic TV themes
- Replies: 35
- Views: 3660
Re: Classic TV themes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5ohUHIjAxI&feature=fvw Minder FTW. Couldn't find the closing credits tune but that was a party-banger as well. Party-banger . The music for the 70's classic, I, Claudius is one that springs to mind, working brilliantly as both opening and closing music, raising y...
- Tue Aug 18, 2009 8:08 am
- Forum: Off-topic
- Topic: Favourite Oxymorons
- Replies: 45
- Views: 4294
- Sun Aug 09, 2009 9:49 am
- Forum: Off-topic
- Topic: The long-awaited music thread!
- Replies: 33
- Views: 4731
Re: The long-awaited music thread!
Just a couple of samples, here and here that I did for the computer game Locomotion. I got the gig as I play badminton with the composer & producer of the music, Allister Brimble. Sadly the game wasn't as popular as its predecessor Transport Tycoon, which sold several million copies worldwide. A...
Re: Moonshine
Or Brigabloodydoon, if you're into tmesis and dislike the show as much as I do. I'd rather do a Full Monty anyday.Phil Reynolds wrote:Were you also with them when they missed their local amateur operatic society's production of Lerner & Loewe's classic musical Brigadoon in similar circumstances?
- Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:53 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd July 2009
- Replies: 31
- Views: 3761
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd July 2009
Hmm, R4, MOISTER as DC-equaller. I think I'm getting a fixation.
Exciting game again. Paul was more consistent today, though pleasingly still taking risks with interesting words. Confusingly Chambers and OED have FURBISHER^, which I got moments before realising that REFURBISH was more likely.
Exciting game again. Paul was more consistent today, though pleasingly still taking risks with interesting words. Confusingly Chambers and OED have FURBISHER^, which I got moments before realising that REFURBISH was more likely.
- Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:27 pm
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: The fantastic Jeff Stelling
- Replies: 91
- Views: 11646
Re: The fantastic Jeff Stelling
I know that Matt would agree with me that stating that someone agrees with you in these forums is a risky thing to do.Percy Round wrote:Thank you, Matt: I'm glad you agree with me.
- Tue Jul 21, 2009 7:06 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Tomspoilery for Tuesday 21st
- Replies: 41
- Views: 3559
Re: Tomspoilery for Tuesday 21st
Awesome game, when he declared 4 in the POINTIER round I was pretty flabbergasted, but clearly he was just hilariously inconsistent, whereas his opponent was fairly average. Great stuff. Yes, after a disastrous start, some good spots from Paul, but a game of highs and lows for him. How come when he...
- Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:39 am
- Forum: Off-topic
- Topic: Favourite Oxymorons
- Replies: 45
- Views: 4294
Re: Favourite Oxymorons
There's a line in the stage version of The Full Monty where Jeanette, the ageing piano player, mentions that she's called her agent to see about getting back into the business, only to be told that he died ten years ago. "I said, a dead agent? That's definitely an oxymoron." I always thou...
- Fri Jul 17, 2009 10:36 pm
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: Ian Hyland Conspiracy
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2923
Re: Ian Hyland Conspiracy
This is old news, and if you read down the post, you'll see that in-ear words will be acknowledged from September.Wil Ransome wrote:If they don't want to be exposed for doing this then they deserve to be exposed.
- Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:46 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilerizers for Thursday 16 July 2009
- Replies: 42
- Views: 3846
Re: Spoilerizers for Thursday 16 July 2009
Pugh, Pugh, Barney McGrew, Cuthbert, Dibble, Grub. I often wondered if it was Barney, McGrew For forty years I've always assumed the latter, but a quick peak at youtube reveals that Barney McGrew is the driver of the fire engine, although very impolitely he's the only one who doesn't nod when his n...
- Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:32 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilerizers for Thursday 16 July 2009
- Replies: 42
- Views: 3846
Re: Spoilerizers for Thursday 16 July 2009
I think that was one of my best ever contestant-intro-based predictions. Hmm, I'm not sure how un-PC it is, but I do tend to try to work out how good contestants are going to be by their appearance and speech. Somehow I had a feeling about today's challenger... OCARINA as a contestant beater in Rou...
- Thu Jul 16, 2009 5:05 pm
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: Worst Players
- Replies: 23
- Views: 3185
Re: Worst Players
For a moment I thought that was being a bit harsh on Andrew. Then I read the other spoilers. Grr.Douglas Wilson wrote:Today's player has got to be up there with the worst ever.
- Thu Jul 16, 2009 3:28 pm
- Forum: Off-topic
- Topic: Getting On - Jo Brand
- Replies: 15
- Views: 4094
Re: Getting On - Jo Brand
Episode 2 ... hmm, not as many lol moments, and less toilet humour, but I think it's going to be worth being patient. Peter Capaldi appeared for about three lines, and I can't imagine his talents won't get more time later. There doesn't seem to be an episode formula set up yet, though it's starting ...
- Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:11 pm
- Forum: Off-topic
- Topic: Getting On - Jo Brand
- Replies: 15
- Views: 4094
Re: Getting On - Jo Brand
OK, I'm not sorry in the least.kevin manthorpe wrote:Don't apologise!
- Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:04 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
- Replies: 28
- Views: 3682
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
I'd say aphasia too, except I'm finding it difficult.Charlie Reams wrote:It seemed to be some blend of amorphous, aphesis, amphoras and aqueous at least.Andrew Hulme wrote: Only thing that I think apterous helped that much with today was apheous??! Anyone got any ideas where the chuff I got that from?!
- Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:09 pm
- Forum: Off-topic
- Topic: If you cut a toilet in half, do you get two lavatories?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2074
Re: If you cut a toilet in half, do you get two la
You'll be happy to know that Thomas Crapper is still in toilets.George Jenkins wrote:If you cut a lavatory pan (The correct name) in half, you get a big leak and two pieces of crap china.
- Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:33 pm
- Forum: Off-topic
- Topic: Getting On - Jo Brand
- Replies: 15
- Views: 4094
Re: Getting On - Jo Brand
But was he a bit harsh on TTF?!! Someone thought so... ;) What's your opinion? I just watched Taking the Flak, and thought that Tom Sutcliffe's review is spot on. The dialogue feels too contrived, and the acting too actory, which is the opposite of Getting On, IMHO. Guess I'm disagreeing with a Kev...
- Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:29 pm
- Forum: Off-topic
- Topic: Getting On - Jo Brand
- Replies: 15
- Views: 4094
Re: Getting On - Jo Brand
It got a good review from the Independent's brilliant TV critic, Tom Sutcliffe.kevin manthorpe wrote:spot-on target humour
- Sun Jul 12, 2009 9:21 am
- Forum: Off-topic
- Topic: Getting On - Jo Brand
- Replies: 15
- Views: 4094
Getting On - Jo Brand
If you didn't catch it, Jo Brand's new comedy Getting On is well worth watching. Several laugh-out-loud moments in the spoof fly-on-the-wall format, with sharp writing and good acting. I'll be following this one. Did anyone else see it?
- Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:18 pm
- Forum: Off-topic
- Topic: getting nekkid
- Replies: 31
- Views: 2557
Re: getting nekkid
Do you mean just for this forum? Yes. Often I'll follow a link and then go off on a little adventure, and then it irks me to have try and find my way back to where I was. Do you mean automatically for your whole browser? That would obviously be pretty horrible. No. That would be horrible. So you're...
- Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:48 pm
- Forum: Off-topic
- Topic: getting nekkid
- Replies: 31
- Views: 2557
Re: getting nekkid
Possibly the greatest enemy of amateur theatre: amateur theatre reviewers . Not the first one that I've read that gives the impression of the reviewer not having been there at all, Dave. I've played in a few where I'm sure that this has been the case. I'm sure that there have been one or two profes...
- Thu Jul 09, 2009 6:49 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Thursday 9th July (Andrew Hulme)
- Replies: 36
- Views: 3658
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 9th July (Andrew Hulme)
I really like this Michael guy. (not enough to spell his silly name properly though) I reckon Micheal (I'm going to spell his name properly) should win the prize for being the smilingest, bouncingest contestant. Was anyone else put off their stroke by Rachel's MATERIAL girl twirl? Impressive openin...
- Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:02 pm
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: I'm leaving
- Replies: 35
- Views: 6289
Re: I'm leaving
Yes, though pointing out that no-one gives a toss after 18 posts maybe lessens the strength of your argument.Andy Thomson wrote:Nobody announces that they're leaving an internet forum. You just don't visit any more. Seems to me you'd have to be exceedingly self-centred to think that anyone would give a toss.
- Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:51 pm
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: I'm leaving
- Replies: 35
- Views: 6289
Re: I'm leaving
I just wonder if Rob Thomas will be tempted to have just one peek to see if he's got any "yes, I agree" posts. Is there a sneakylastlookometer running on the site ? If you look at someone's profile you can see when they last visited, which is probably good enough. But you don't have to lo...
- Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:42 pm
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: I'm leaving
- Replies: 35
- Views: 6289
Re: I'm leaving
I just wonder if Rob Thomas will be tempted to have just one peek to see if he's got any "yes, I agree" posts. Is there a sneakylastlookometer running on the site ?
- Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:48 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Tuesday 7th July
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2650
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 7th July
R9 equaller PAEAN
- Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:00 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Monday 6th July
- Replies: 26
- Views: 4267
Re: Spoilers for Monday 6th July
Was this the first audience-conundrum-shot in modern times? Did anyone get the conundram at home? I was nowhere near, not that that says anything. I remember reading somewhere on here that throwing the unsolved conundrums back to the studio audience was a direct response to audience feedback reques...
- Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:50 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Monday 6th July
- Replies: 26
- Views: 4267
Re: Spoilers for Monday 6th July
Nice finish to an enjoyable octochamp run - congratulations, Innis. I'll be looking forward to the finals. Was this the first audience-conundrum-shot in modern times? Did anyone get the conundram at home? I was nowhere near, not that that says anything. I thought I had a DC beater in R1 with UNPLIAN...
- Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:59 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Thursday July 2nd
- Replies: 20
- Views: 2258
Re: Spoilers for Thursday July 2nd
The Full Monty? If yes, I've played in the band for this about 40 times ... a cracking show. Erm, yes.Phil Reynolds wrote:Got to go and get nekkid in front of several hundred people.
- Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:51 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Thursday July 2nd
- Replies: 20
- Views: 2258
Re: Spoilers for Thursday July 2nd
R12 equaller RINSABLE You forgot to include the word "invalid" before "equaller". :| Of course, you're right .... darn ... checked NAPPES with Apterous (as I thought it questionable), but just Chambers for RINSABLE^, as it seemed a familiar one (and was there). It's not in the O...
- Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:17 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Thursday July 2nd
- Replies: 20
- Views: 2258
Re: Spoilers for Thursday July 2nd
R11 NAPPES
R12 equaller RINSABLE
I'm enjoying your run so far, Innis. Quite apart from your casual brilliance, we've had you applauding yourself after Jeff's introduction, and subtle armpit-scratching the day before as Jeff spoke to you. Superb ... a real trumpeter, clearly.
R12 equaller RINSABLE
I'm enjoying your run so far, Innis. Quite apart from your casual brilliance, we've had you applauding yourself after Jeff's introduction, and subtle armpit-scratching the day before as Jeff spoke to you. Superb ... a real trumpeter, clearly.
- Wed Jul 01, 2009 7:47 am
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: Jellyman's Thrown A Wobbly
- Replies: 17
- Views: 3462
Re: Jellyman's Thrown A Wobbly
What's the difference between the OED and ODE? Nothing to a dyslexic But if you get it wrong it'll cost you... The OED is the full multi-volume version that's given to the Countdown champion, and ODE is the single-volume version that is the official source of words for Countdown. ODE costs £26.25 f...
- Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:21 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Friday 26th June
- Replies: 32
- Views: 3169
Re: Spoilers for Friday 26th June
Maybe Rachel had spotted GAMEST ...Peter Mabey wrote:BTW, nobody's commented that Rachel put up ^GAMETS for GAMUTS
- Mon Jun 22, 2009 8:18 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Monday June 22nd
- Replies: 18
- Views: 3272
Re: Spoilers for Monday June 22nd
But a shame that the audience were on sleeping pills. Or maybe they were tired after the walk from Leeds.Jojo Apollo wrote:Good to see legend Tim Vine back in Dictionary Corner
- Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:07 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Thur 18 June 2009 [Series 60- 2nd SF]
- Replies: 50
- Views: 4705
Re: Spoilers for Thur 18 June 2009 [Series 60- 2nd SF]
A nice bit of acting from Hamish, too. Another shocking story for the tabloids.Phil Reynolds wrote:However, it's a tribute to the people in the gallery and to the editor that the whole thing looks seamless in the final cut.
- Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:02 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Tuesday June 9
- Replies: 20
- Views: 3478
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday June 9
I thought the face looked familiar. Are these two birds of a feather related?
- Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:08 am
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Monday June 8th
- Replies: 23
- Views: 3176
Re: Spoilers for Monday June 8th
I was surprised by the disallowal of CASKED today - it's in the online OED and my Chambers, though obviously not in ODE or on Apterous. I thought that the challenger looked a bit surprised too.
- Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:37 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Monday June 8th
- Replies: 23
- Views: 3176
Re: Spoilers for Monday June 8th
1st numbers alt:
(50+5)*(6-1)+(8/8)
(50+5)*(6-1)+(8/8)
- Fri Jun 05, 2009 2:18 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Wednesday, 3rd June
- Replies: 32
- Views: 4657
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday, 3rd June
According to Collins, the UK spelling is SPECIALITY for both senses mentioned by Brian (a special interest or skill, and a service or product specialized in). However, SPECIALTY is listed under a separate entry, having a particular meaning in law - a formal contract or obligation expressed in a dee...
- Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:57 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Wednesday, 3rd June
- Replies: 32
- Views: 4657
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday, 3rd June
I always thought specialty was an American word, and specialIty was the British version. I personally have never heard anyone in England say specialty in conversation YET, but perhaps it is another one of those that are creeping in through the proliferation of American films and TV. I'm fairly sure...
- Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:51 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers - Thursday 4th June 2009
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2011
Re: Spoilers - Thursday 4th June 2009
Matt Morrison wrote:quality shot of the audience there... wish I had Sky+, any C4Cers in the audience?
I thought I spotted someone who looks like Mike Brown but I'm not entirely sure.
R8 equaller DESIROUS
- Tue May 12, 2009 4:35 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Tuesday 12th May - Jimmy Gough's post-debut
- Replies: 34
- Views: 2938
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 12th May - Jimmy Gough's post-debut
I'm very much hoping Jimmy gets through to the finals ... we could have some fireworks with him in the mix. Interesting how Steve Davis's Countdown play is erratic, in complete contrast to his snooker. OBVIATE yesterday, and NEBULAS today; but not much else, apparently. I think there was ENDEARED in...
- Sun Apr 26, 2009 6:56 pm
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: CountMax errors
- Replies: 727
- Views: 96231
Re: CountMax errors
I'd agree. This can of worms is a pain in the arse.Ian Volante wrote:Just a can of bloody worms...
- Sun Apr 26, 2009 2:27 pm
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: CountMax errors
- Replies: 727
- Views: 96231
Re: CountMax errors
GRANITES is one that I was thinking sounds wrong, whereas I would guess that Susie would allow rocks or minerals that might be thought of as individual things (e.g. OPALS). But I can't think of any types of rock that could be thought of as individual things in the same way. MARBLES? ;) You've been ...
- Sun Apr 26, 2009 1:26 pm
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: CountMax errors
- Replies: 727
- Views: 96231
Re: CountMax errors
Strange, cos in the contestant guidelines I'm sure it says 'rocks or minerals are pluralisable' or something like that. You're right, they are mentioned in the introduction to the ODE (pages xi - xii) as nouns which may be pluralisable, and the guidelines you get for the show are based on that. How...
- Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:43 am
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
- Replies: 49
- Views: 5192
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
I'd guess from James's speech patterns that he's slightly autistic, which would excuse some of the faux pas that made people dislike him. I'm surprised no one commented on this before, given the highly-tuned aut-dar possessed by some of our number. I'd been thinking exactly the same, but had refrai...
- Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:26 am
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Friday 17th April
- Replies: 27
- Views: 4810
Re: Spoilers for Friday 17th April
Well CHOIR is in the OED as a verb, so I reckoned CHOIRED would be allowed I'm not sure which OED you're referring to here, but it's not the one used on the programme. It was the online complete OED, which I know is not the one used in the programme; but as I didn't think it was a contentious word,...
- Wed Apr 22, 2009 7:38 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
- Replies: 49
- Views: 5192
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
They were deceptive letters today, I thought - they looked like they should yield higher scores than they did - I kept on thinking that I must be missing bigger words, but they weren't there. Maybe I'm confused by thinking that Tim Vine is really Peter Davison.
- Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:21 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Friday 17th April
- Replies: 27
- Views: 4810
Re: Spoilers for Friday 17th April
Well CHOIR is in the OED as a verb, so I reckoned CHOIRED would be allowed, in the same way that BUM is in the dictionary, so you could have BUMMED.Phil Reynolds wrote:Bum is also in my dictionary.Brian Moore wrote:Bum, sorry, was in my dictionary
- Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:10 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Friday 17th April
- Replies: 27
- Views: 4810
Re: Spoilers for Friday 17th April
Bum, sorry, was in my dictionary and didn't think it was a dodgy one.Phil Reynolds wrote:blah blah Lexplorer blah blah save yourself embarrassment blahBrian Moore wrote:Also CHOIRED in R1
- Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:17 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Friday 17th April
- Replies: 27
- Views: 4810
Re: Spoilers for Friday 17th April
Also CHOIRED in R1
- Mon Apr 13, 2009 5:45 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Thurs 9 April Spoiler Thread
- Replies: 24
- Views: 4239
Re: Thurs 9 April Spoiler Thread
To be fair, Andrew wasn't brought onto the show to be eloquent or charming. Jonathan Ansell, on the other hand, was actually paid for telling dull stories that didn't go anywhere and ending virtually every sentence with "...er, so yeah." Go figure. My mother liked Jonathan Ansell, but she...